Minimalistic investment portfolio for 2019
This article is about the investment allocations for a disciplined minimalist Canadian investor for 2019. I decided to use only two asset classes in the liquid side of the portfolio: equities and government bonds, while also considering the primary residence as part of the portfolio. For a typical Canadian, the primary residence is a considerable part of the family assets. Many advisers do not include the real estate in the NAV and in the portfolio analysis - I think still that real estate forms an integral part of one's assets. So we assume that the family has around a half of assets placed in the house equity and a moderate mortgage.
The proposed sample 2019 allocation is below:
Global Equities: 40%
Government bonds: 15%
Primary residence: 65%
Borrowing/Mortgage: -20%
Why not allocate more to equities? A family that owns its primary residence already has equity exposure - as a rule of thumb, we can assume that a house is basket of 30% equities and 70% fixed income, so the total household equity exposure would be around 58%. Secondly, and most importantly, in this late cycle environment, it is prudent to own downside protection, and bonds provide one, along with USD exposure. We believe the long duration US bonds (20-30 year if possible) provide good diversification to a Canadian investor.
Why not include other asset classes (REITs, credit)? Firstly, the goal is to create a very simple portfolio, and managing additional sources of return takes considerable extra effort. Secondly, for credit, we may see a period of poor return as this economic cycle is in its late stages, and as the quality of credit has somewhat deteriorated. REITs are already a part of the global equities and, for the sake of simplicity, we exclude them.
Why not allocate more to Canadian equities? In fact, Canadian investors get taxation breaks on investing in Canada, but that comes at the expense of diversification. I will write about that in the following posts, which will cover more complex portfolios and their advantages. But this post is about being minimalist.
Which securities to use?
Here the key consideration is to deliver the desired exposure with cost and tax efficiency. The dividend and interest income on all securities are taxed by any combination of the following: the government of domicile country, the US government (where the sponsoring bank for the ETF is located), and by the Canadian government.
Allocation by type of account: RRSP/TFSA/RESP/non-registered
The RRSP account is the easiest from the tax standpoint: because of a tax agreement between the US and Canadian governments, the dividend and interest income is not taxed by either government. There is still the foreign income taxation, but that seems unavoidable. In RRSP, we allocate to the following ETF delivering global equity and long-duration US treasuries:
ACWI: 73%
TLT: 27%
The TFSA account is the worst misnomer - "Tax-Free Savings Account" is not tax-free, and it should not be used for "savings", but for longer-term investments. TFSA is free only from Canadian taxes, but the U.S. still taxes the income on any US-listed ETF. To avoid that, there are swap-based ETFs that use total return swaps to gain the exposure and do not distribute any income. In TFSA, we allocate as follows with ETF giving exposure to S&P 500 and 7-10 year treasuries:
HXS.TO: 73%
HTB.TO: 23%
The same allocation will work for non-registered accounts.
Those with children - RESP accounts do not allow US currency and are subject to the same US witholding taxation, so the same HSX / HTB ETF will work.
To summarize, I build a set of tax-optimized minimalistic portfolios for this part of the economic cycle. As always: by reading this, you agree that this is not a financial advice and that individual investors' situation may require other allocations.
Below is a detailed reference on the taxation of registered investment accounts:
https://www.firstasset.com/resources/education/?article=Reference+Guide%3A+Foreign+Withholding+Taxes+on+ETFs+for+Canadian+Investors
The next post will be about more complex and diversified portfolios.
Comments